The vision... it's really very deep. Very beautiful. Very meaningful. It shows what truly matters. It's the things on the inside, not the outside that count, and although the outside things are really nice, they can be distracting and... you really need to focus on what's real.
The originality is brilliant. I've never seen anything like this before. Very one-of-a-kind.
The technique is very fine, very precise. It captures the writer's depth of thought, and all the emotions in this, all of that in just a few words.
It affected me deeply. How well this was written, it's like it's happening to you right here, right now.
This was beautiful.

I know I can agree with others when I say that the sentiment and message in this poem are really lovely, just makes me feel warm inside! I think the word best to describe it would be "cute" - naive, optimistic, but overall with such an amount of impact on the reader that it captivates them.

Being free-verse and therefore without any meter, rhyme or rhythm, the poem really was propped up by it's message alone. I'll get to more on that when I critique the technique.

I can say that the jump from "wait there to be found/one day I lost my passion" seemed to ruin the wonderful momentum you had been building up from the first two stanzas, but then you redeemed yourself with the fantastic imagery of the following lines, so the reader wasn't left suddenly thrown into a narrative. I felt the same sort of jump later on with "I faced all those lost arguments and ideas and aspirations and promises/And I told them I was sorry." but it worked really well in that instance, so good job on that one. Just watch out for jamming up the pace of the reader, it can completely change the reception of a poem!

The vision was great - the title caught my fancy, the concept reeled me in and from there on I was happily tugged along for the ride with curiosity.

Though, I can say that the idea of a "Place For Lost Things" is far from original, neither the sentiment of loss and gain. It's one of those things that seem to pop up every now and then in media or quotes, but you can't pinpoint an exact place as to where the idea originated. If that makes sense.

Technique wasn't something that I felt I could rate highly with a poem like this - written simply like speech, presented like dot-points. There is a lack of (more complex) poetic technique that makes your style read like prose. Incidentally, I think when writing free-verse the absence of structure demands more complexity and specificity of words, which can be something to work on in future. Finally, you know repetition can be very effective (and builds up great momentum in this piece) but my advice would be to avoid relying on starting lines with "And," or "Sometimes," as the act of dropping down to a new line already renders the words pointless. Negating the words would have the same effect without the superfluousness, and would create room for more complex imagery.

Anyway, good job! Your style seems more like prose than poetry, and I think it can be hard to find a midway between the two.

It's a nice feeling to carry your poem's happy little concept in your head after reading.